Messaging
application WhatsApp has now reached a stage where it runs your everyday social
media life. Or in many cases, ruins as well. On Thursday, the administrator of
a WhatsApp group was arrested from Marathwada, Maharashtra. His crime — being
the administrator of a group where a video of a man slaughtering a cow and
abusing the Prime Minister was shared — allowing circulation of what was dubbed
‘objectionable’ content.
Days
ago, Ambika (name changed), an employee of an e-commerce portal filed a sexual
harassment complaint against her colleague for a sexually demeaning post sent
on a WhatsApp group. In such cases, who has control of what is posted on the
group? Certainly not the administrator, who cannot even delete such a post from
the group. “In this case, what will authorities do if Ambika herself is the
admin of the group? Will they arrest her?” asks Karthik Lakshmanan, an ardent
social media user. “It’s a no-brainer. They should not arrest people for
something trivial,” he adds.
Instead,
says college student Ali Husain Dahodwala, who is part of about 20 groups, the
person who sends such content should be held responsible. The groups he is a
part of, he says, have an average of three administrators.
However,
Dhanya Menon, cyber security expert, has a different take. “Like how a
principal is in charge of whatever happens in a school, the administrator is
responsible for content in the group,” she contends. “The administrator is the
one who creates the group and adds or removes members, so he or she should know
who is being added and what content the members may share.” She adds that if
one is unsure of the group members or the content going to be shared, that
person has the option to simply exit the group. Menon also says that till
specific legislation on the subject is brought in, holding the admin
responsible makes sense. “And it’s not like the ones who posted the content
will go scot-free. They will also be arrested,” she points out.
The
drawbacks are manifold. First, WhatsApp administrators have no control of the
content posted on the group — he or she cannot moderate or delete content and
can only remove the person who posted it. Second, what one person considers objectionable,
another may not. So first decide what is universally objectionable, says
Lakshmanan.
Third, there are several
technical loopholes. A group can have multiple administrators, and if the
person who created the group quits, the system automatically assigns another
administrator at random. Can this person be held responsible? “No, he cannot.
And first thing I’m going to do is exit all groups,” concludes Lakshmanan on a
lighter note.
Source : http://www.newindianexpress.com/
Source : http://www.newindianexpress.com/
No comments:
Post a Comment